Retirees of aviation parastatals file N10.2b suit over alleged eviction
of the Nigerian Civil Aviation Authority (NCAA), Nigerian Airspace Management Agency (NAMA), and Federal Airports Authority of Nigeria (FAAN).Joined as respondents are the Nigerian Civil Aviation Authority (NCAA), Nigerian Airspace Management Agency (NAMA), Federal Airports Authority of Nigeria (FAAN), Director-General of Nigerian Civil Aviation Authority (NCAA), Director-General of Federal Airports Authority of Nigeria (FAAN), and Director-General of Nigerian Airspace Management Agency (NAMA).
Different respondents are the Commissioner of Police (IGP), Lagos State, and Inspector-General of Police.The trial judge, Justice AbdulAziz Anka, deferred the matter till September 8 for becoming aware of the suit.
The candidates in a starting summon, checked FHC/L/CS/1135/16, recorded and contended under the steady gaze of the court by their guidance, Olukoya Ogungbeje, are looking for a presentation that their capture, provocation and confinement by the Lagos State Commissioner of Police and IGP at the incitement of the respondents on August 6, 2016, without legitimate reason isn't right, Illegal unlawful, illegal, invalid and void.
They kept up that the activity abuses their central rights as cherished under areas 33,34,35 and 36 of the 1999 Constitution of the Federal Republic of Nigeria.
The candidates are additionally looking for a request convincing the respondents to pay the total of N10.2billion as general and model harms for unlawful and wrongful capture, detainment, intense attack and ousting with no court request, and in addition a request reestablishing and reestablishing them to their private houses forthwith.
The candidates additionally look for a request of never-ending order, controlling the respondents, together and severally, their officers, specialists, workers, privies or howsoever called and associated, from capturing, scaring, bugging, mortifying, keeping, removing or irritating them in any way at all.
The candidates, in an affirmation dismissed to by Oni Babatunde Akanni, asserted that at some point in 2003, there was an issue of monetisation in appreciation of private quarters because of them. He said their rights in the property finished in suit and there was subsisting request limiting the respondents from pestering them.
He included that the respondents have been undermining and badgering them with capture and confinement over the matter, notwithstanding the substituting court order.The deponent additionally affirmed that on August 6, 2016, at around 5.30am, around 80 hooligans, joined by intensely equipped policemen and officers of the respondents, raged and attacked their private houses and laid them under attack in commando-like approach, captured and kept them.
0 comments: